Trump’s Plans for Deregulation and Their Impact on Housing Costs
Federal policies significantly influence the housing market, shaping supply, demand, and affordability. Under Trump’s leadership, deregulation has emerged as a key strategy to address housing affordability, where the administration aims to make housing more accessible to Americans. However, experts remain divided on the feasibility and potential outcomes of these policies and their broader implications for the real estate sector.
Immigration policies’ influence on housing market demand
Trump’s immigration policies have introduced notable changes to the housing landscape. A key proposal involves restricting mortgage eligibility for undocumented immigrants, aiming to reduce housing demand and improve affordability for US citizens.
Yet, the overall impact may be limited. Undocumented immigrants account for a small percentage of mortgage holders, meaning the policy’s effect on demand is likely minimal. More importantly, many undocumented workers play a crucial role in housing construction. Reducing this labor pool could worsen supply shortages, inadvertently driving up housing costs. This interplay between housing demand and the construction workforce highlights the complexity of immigration policies.
Deregulation’s promises and pitfalls in home construction
Deregulation is central to Trump’s housing strategy, aimed at cutting red tape and reducing construction costs by up to 30%. The administration targets environmental and zoning regulations as barriers to affordable housing, seeking to streamline processes and encourage development.
While these measures could expand the housing supply, the goal of achieving a 30% cost reduction has drawn skepticism. Many regulations are designed to ensure safety, fairness, and sustainability in development. Removing them too quickly could lead to issues like lower-quality construction or inequitable development.
Opening federal land for housing projects is another proposed solution. While this may increase land availability, much of the federal land is located in rural areas with lower demand, limiting its impact in high-demand urban markets.
Tax incentives and their role in homeownership rates
Tax reforms under Trump’s administration have reshaped homeownership incentives. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) introduced measures like a cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions and limits on mortgage interest deductions. While these changes aimed to simplify the tax code, they have had mixed effects on the housing market.
The SALT cap has been particularly impactful in high-tax states such as California and New York, increasing the cost of homeownership. As a result, some buyers have shifted to lower-tax states, altering demand patterns across the country.
Limits on mortgage interest deductions have also affected middle- and upper-income homeowners, particularly those purchasing higher-priced homes. However, the administration has signaled possible expansions of tax incentives for first-time homebuyers, which could offset some of these impacts and encourage younger buyers to enter the market.
Federal Reserve and fiscal policies affecting mortgage rates
While the Federal Reserve operates independently, Trump’s fiscal policies can indirectly influence mortgage rates. Tax cuts and increased spending have expanded the federal deficit, raising concerns about inflation. To counter these pressures, the Federal Reserve may raise interest rates, affecting the cost of borrowing for homebuyers.
During Trump’s presidency, stable economic growth initially kept interest rates low. However, sustained deficits could lead to higher borrowing costs in the future, potentially discouraging homeownership, particularly among first-time buyers.
The combined effects of Trump’s deregulation, tax reforms, and immigration policies will shape the housing market’s future. Efforts to expand the housing supply may be offset by labor shortages and borrowing cost increases.
In high-demand regions, the administration’s policies may face challenges in delivering meaningful affordability improvements. However, in lower-demand areas, opening federal land could spur development and provide relief. Tax policies will continue to influence buying decisions, especially in high-tax states. While reforms under the TCJA have created hurdles, new incentives could encourage homeownership in certain segments of the market.
Sources:
To keep up-to-date with our latest luxury homes news, subscribe to our newsletter today.